Who Is at Fault for a MARTA Bus Accident?įollowing any accident type, liability is a crucial issue. We are always available to listen to you. Furthermore, you can contact us at Calvin Smith Law to learn more about bus accidents and victims’ rights. So, to take you a step closer to getting compensated for injuries sustained in a MARTA accident, we discuss possible liable parties. Knowing the fault party in a bus accident makes it easier for accident victims to get financial compensation. These collisions could be the bus driver’s fault, the bus manufacturer’s, MARTA’s, or a third party’s. Like every other road transport system - cars, trucks, motorcycles, bicycles - buses are prone to traffic collisions. But as our MARTA bus accident lawyers know, the reliability of this public transportation does not make it free from accidents. MARTA buses are a reliable way for Atlanta residents and visitors to get around. ![]() The public transportation agency’s history goes as far back as the 1950s, providing rail and bus services. We wont let anyone stand in the way to your rights.MARTA stands for the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. You need local attorneys that have the experience and determination to see your case though to the end in the face of adversity. We are dedicated to helping those injured as a result of someone else negligence. is a Marietta based personal injury law firm. We are proud of our work and look forward to helping others in similar situations!Ĭohen & Sinowski, P.C. As you can see from our client’s case, it’s important to have a strong legal team on your side who will fight hard for what they believe in. We hope that this post has helped you understand a little bit more about our case and what happens during trial. Knowing what’s going on with your opponent’s strategy helps you prepare for cross examination and figure out where they are weak so that you can attack them there. We’ve learned that you need to know your facts, the law, how it applies to your case, and ultimately being prepared and organized for any question/issue that may come. Sometimes you need to turn over rocks to find out what is hiding on your side of the caseĪs a trial lawyer, we spend a lot of time in court. The case is now closed and we believe justice has been served for both parties involved in this matter. Ultimately, the jury found that MARTA was at fault and awarded $380,000.00 to the Plaintiff.Īfter many months of litigation, we finally went to trial and obtained another victory for our client! The jury awarded $380,000 in damages for pain and suffering as well as medical expenses incurred after being hit by this MARTA bus! Ultimately, the jury found that MARTA was at fault despite what MARTA claimed. The jury was visibly agreeing with everything our witnesses was saying. Their expert had used such wrong data that he was incorrect about: the length of the bus, the length of our client’s car, the direction of the intersection, the width of the road, the speed of the bus, the angle of the turn, the positions of the vehicles, and more. She was able to show that MARTA’s expert had used incorrect date. Our expert, who was limited in her testimony by the Court, refuted everything their expert said. Their expert created an accident reconstruction animation to show the jury that MARTA could do nothing to prevent the accident. MARTA hired an expert witness to “prove” that our client was at fault. We claimed that the MARTA bus driver was negligent in making the turn too fast, too sharp of a turn, and was violating almost every MARTA policy and commercial driver guideline, but MARTA denied their driver did anything wrong and instead blamed our client for the wreck. Our client, was stopped at a red light when the MARTA bus made a left hand turn and hit our clients driver side front. Ultimately, the jury found that MARTA was at fault and awarded $380,000.00 to the Plaintiff Our client, was stopped a red light when the MARTA bus made a left hand turn hitting our clients driver side front. Our expert refuted everything their expert said. MARTA’s expert claimed our client was at fault. At trial, two expert accident reconstructionist testified as to how the wreck happened. The case was tried before the Superior Court of Fulton County. ![]() Our client, was stopped a red light when a MARTA bus made a left hand turn hitting our clients driver side front. Jury Verdict of $380,000.00 against MARTA
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |